Transforming a Kingdom MentalityAs little as two decades ago, a large number of American companies operated in kingdom environments. Most of those environments are gone, transformed into battlegrounds or jungles by the pressures of globalization, technology, increased efficiency, and the ever-increasing demands for improved quality and low prices.
Under this old model, most business activity took place in the lower left triangle of the market environment matrix. Today, however, the great majority of activity is shifting to the upper right.
One of the biggest problems facing American corporations today is that they are competing in jungles or battlegrounds, while still attempting to function using a kingdom structure and mentality. By now it should be obvious that this arrangement leads, at best, to serious dysfunction, and at worst to financial failure. Nevertheless, this is still a pervasive problem in the American business landscape.
At the heart of such a change is an awareness of the difference between how things used to be and how they are now. The goal used to be to dominate the market and thereby control prices and margins. The goal today, however, is often to maintain a large enough piece of the market to be considered a major player, and thereby to partly determine the direction of that market.
It hardly needs to be said that this change has enormous ramifications for every aspect of an organization.
Simply put, most large American corporations must not only learn to live with a less-than-dominant position (at least with some of their products), but they must also redesign their structures, functions, and strategies to succeed in a non-kingdom market environment.
While this is a large and difficult task, it is not Herculean. In any event, the only alternative is to resist change, stay the current course, and pray for divine (or governmental) intervention.
In short, American organizations (and quite a few non-American ones) need to bring themselves into alignment with their market environments, or else choose to work in those environments with which they find themselves already aligned. This second option, unfortunately, is not always readily available.
We must each accept the task of taking a close, hard look at our own organizations. But in order to do so, we first need to become familiar with the four archetypes of organizations - each one ideally suited for survival and success in one of the four market environments. It is to this task that we turn in the following chapter.